This study assessed retrofits for energy efficiency improvement of the University of the Philippines College of Fine Arts New Building atrium. Using EnergyPlus simulation software, the baseline annual energy consumption of the atrium was 39,022.06 kWh. The effects of wall, window, and roof insulation retrofits on energy consumption were evaluated. Wall insulations included polystyrene, fiberglass, gypsum board, aerogel-based coating, polystyrene-gypsum board, and fiberglass-gypsum board. Except for gypsum board and aerogel-based coating, all wall insulations in the atrium resulted in reduced energy consumption. This reduction is primarily due to decreased cooling loads, directly reducing air conditioning unit (ACU) usage. Since ACUs are the main energy consumers in the atrium, this decrease leads to overall energy savings. Reduced cooling loads are attributed to significantly lower heat gain or OTTV through the walls. External heat gain through the building envelope constitutes a substantial part of the atrium's heat load. By minimizing external heat gain, less energy is needed to cool the atrium, thereby reducing the ACU consumption and overall energy consumption. Window insulations evaluated were single clear exterior film, single reflective tinted exterior film, single clear interior film, single reflective tinted interior film, double clear film, and double reflective tinted film. All window insulations resulted in an insignificant reduction in energy consumption due to minimal decreases in cooling loads. The negligible reduction in cooling load can be attributed to negligible OTTV reduction through the windows. Consequently, this leads to negligible decrease in energy consumption and energy savings. Roof insulations assessed are polystyrene, fiberboard sheathing, gypsum board, polyurethane foam, roof membrane paint, and opaque glass. All roof retrofits resulted in negligible energy consumption reduction. It is due to insignificant decrease in cooling load which is to the negligible OOTV reduction. Subsequently, this leads to the negligible reduction in energy consumption and minimal energy savings. Moreover, it was also found that the baseline OTTV for wall, window and roof exceed the maximum allowable OTTV mandated in the DOE guidelines. This indicates that the current set-up of the atrium is not energy efficient. Excessive solar heat gain leads to thermal stratification which occurs when warm air rises to the ceiling and cold air sinks to the floor, thereby increasing the indoor temperatures and causing uneven solar radiation distribution. Subsequently, resulting in high cooling load demand and high energy consumption. Additionally, interactions between retrofits showed no significant effect on energy consumption. Financial analysis identified fiberglass as the most cost-effective retrofit, reducing annual energy consumption to 36,279 kWh, generating annual savings of Php 40,876, and achieving a payback period of 4.01 years.
