This dissertation developed and demonstrated a localized, stakeholder-sensitive Reactor Technology Assessment (RTA) framework for evaluating Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technologies and supporting evidence-based policy formulation for potential deployment in the Philippines. Although Executive Order No. 164 and related policy developments have introduced nuclear power as a potential component of the Philippine energy mix, the country still lacks a localized, stakeholder-sensitive, and industry-driven framework for evaluating reactor technologies. Existing tools, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency Reactor Technology Assessment (IAEA-RTA), provide a systematic and internationally recognized basis for reactor evaluation, but they do not fully capture the deployment conditions of a deregulated and industry-driven electricity market such as that of the Philippines.
To address this gap, the study developed a modified and stakeholder-sensitive adaptation of the IAEA-RTA framework for the Philippine power-sector context. The modified framework retained the original ten Key Elements of the IAEA Reactor Technology Assessment (IAEA-RTA) as its conceptual structure. For the Philippine case study, stakeholder-derived weighting assigned a value of 0.00% to Key Element 6 (Balance of Plant Design for Purposes Other than Electricity Production); consequently, the applied industry-driven assessment used nine weighted Key Elements while preserving the complete ten-Key-Element framework. Philippine energy policies, stakeholder statements, private-sector considerations, and deployment-related factors were incorporated into the assessment process. An Input-Process-Output structure and an industry-driven evaluation matrix were developed to improve the transparency, traceability, and applicability of the assessment workflow. More than 80 SMR technologies were initially reviewed using publicly available technical and institutional references. Based on deployment maturity, availability of verifiable technical information, construction or operational experience, and relevance to the Philippine setting, five SMR technologies were shortlisted for detailed assessment: ACP100, HTR-PM, KLT-40S, CAREM, and BREST-OD-300.
Results showed that the most emphasized assessment areas for Philippine SMR deployment were Economics and Financing (33.96%), followed by Site and Environment, Nuclear Safety, and Technology Readiness (11.32% each). Nuclear Island Design and Performance, Balance of Plant Design and Grid Integration, Safeguards and Protection, and Project Delivery received equal weights (7.55% each), while Fuel Cycle received the lowest weight (1.89%). Among the shortlisted technologies, ACP100 obtained the highest overall weighted score (3.99/5.00), followed by HTR-PM (3.86/5.00), KLT-40S (3.81/5.00), BREST-OD-300 (3.44/5.00), and CAREM (3.29/5.00). The relatively strong performance of ACP100 and HTR-PM was associated with deployment maturity, balanced performance across multiple assessment areas, and greater availability of publicly accessible technical information. However, no single SMR technology performed best across all Key Elements, indicating that reactor technology assessment should consider both technical performance and deployment context.
Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that SMR rankings and comparative performance varied under different government and industry weighting scenarios, confirming that reactor technology assessment is influenced not only by reactor characteristics but also by stakeholder priorities, regulatory considerations, financing requirements, and deployment context. Policy synthesis further demonstrated that government policies primarily establish the regulatory and institutional foundation for nuclear energy development, whereas industry stakeholders emphasize economic viability, financing mechanisms, and investment readiness.
Overall, the study demonstrates that a localized, stakeholder-sensitive, and industry-driven adaptation of the IAEA Reactor Technology Assessment (RTA) framework can serve not only as a systematic tool for evaluating SMR technologies but also as an evidence-based decision-support framework for nuclear energy planning. By integrating technology assessment, stakeholder priorities, and policy synthesis, the developed framework supports transparent and context-specific decision-making for potential SMR deployment in the Philippines and may serve as a useful reference for other newcomer countries with similar electricity market structures and stakeholder environments.